NEWS
CONTACT | AF ISSUES | ARCHIVES | OTHER ISSUES | HATE MAIL | LINKS | ABOUT | SUGGEST NEWS | |||||||||||||||||||||
Mark my words Posted by: Joe on February 1st, 2004 @ 7:33PM It will take 50 years for the US to undo the damage to our reputation that the Super Bowl half-time show did. Comments | GENERAL BLOGGING God's Will or Idiocy? Posted by: Joe on February 1st, 2004 @ 3:58PM Stampede Kills 244 at Hajj Pilgrimage
Uh... no? This isn't God's will. This is stupidity. It isn't like this was a freak incident. People die EVERY YEAR at this thing. Don't you think maybe efforts to prevent it should be stepped up? Comments | GENERAL BLOGGING
My internet hurts. Posted by: Joe on January 31st, 2004 @ 10:39PM ConservaBabes.com Good idea: Registering 'ConservaBabes.com' to showcase hot conservatives and try to change the stereotype of geeky conservatives. Bad Idea: The actual ConservaBabes.com Comments | GENERAL BLOGGING Review of Anti-Flag Concert Posted by: Joe on January 31st, 2004 @ 2:03AM This from the Washington Post:
Fun Fact: Facist regimes focus their indoctrination attempts at the angry youth. I can understand the feeling though; I WAS one of those middle school kids, parents in tow, at an Anti-Flag. I was just starting to be conservative at the time, but I still beleived in their message and their views. Now I'm older (and wiser, I think?). I can't just write those kids off as stupid; I was one of them! If you interact with an Anti-Flag kid, don't insult them. The right won't win any hearts or minds through attacks. Comments (1) | AF ISSUES The War in Iraq: Was it Justified? Posted by: Joe on January 31st, 2004 @ 1:56AM I've been a pretty vocal hawk, so I have a responsibility to defend the war. First, I thought there were WMDs. It just didn't add up that Saddam didn't have them. He kicked the UN out for years, to what? Make cupcakes? Most intelligence (really, all, including the bribed France and Russia) thought Saddam had weapons of mass destruction. Looks like he didn't. It should be important to note that Kay DID also say that there was evidence of programs, as well as documented transfers of WMDs, supplies, and intelligence (in limited quanities) to Syria. Saddam had something; perhaps not the arsenal we thought, but he had enough means to distribute trace amounts to anti-American forces, as well as the intent. While that alone does not justify a war, it builds the case for one. What were the other justifications? There was also concrete evidence of Saddam's intent to restart his nuclear programs. Scientists revealed nuclear components he had been instructed to hide with the express intent of restarting the program with the same equipment and knowledge as before. Saddam was going to wait until the world thought he had reformed before suprising them with a nuclear weapon. Sound familar? It should. The same situation happened in North Korea. The War in Iraq prevented another North Korea situation 10 years down the road. That remains, in my mind, the primary justification for the war. Now, also consider the humanitarian effects and the greater effects on combating terrorism. The United States has freed a people from tyranny and is attempting to install democracy, always a good thing. It will be a long and difficult road, but with dedication, the Iraqi people will be free and prosperous, and a model to others suffering under totalitarian regimes. The significance of this comes in combating the intellectual arguments of terrorism. Islamic Facism has support because people beleive it is a superior form of government to a Liberal Capitalist Democracy. To destroy terrorism at its roots, the allure of Islamic Facism must be destroyed. To do so, we must PROVE that our way of life is superior. This is not done by hoisting the US up on a pillar; rather, it is accomplished by rising part of a people to the same standard and showing them how much better their lives our under our social system. The war was worth it, for these 3 reasons. That is not to say that Bush and Co are absolved from their sins.There are other, more nefarious aspects to consider. First, there is no doubt Bush planned war first and shaped the facts to justify it. He set up a special office in the CIA to forward the most tantalizing bits of intelligence, regardless of their reliability. It is important to keep in mind that even the most conservative estimates still had Saddam posessing WMDS. 'Bush Lied People Died' isn't applicable; I am not absolving him from this intelligene debacle though. There is also the 'War for Oil!' school that seeks to undermind the justificaton of the war. This premise falls apart rather quickly. If oil were the single goal, Bush could have lifted sanctions, saving money and lives. Even if Bush wanted to get his oil buddies in on the action, going to war wouldn't have helped. US is keeping Iraq's oil feilds nationalized, giving contracts out only to repair and improve the oil infastructure of Iraq, NOT to control the oil itself. I am not naive enough to say oil had never crossed their minds, but to implicate it as the ONLY reasons (or even a major reason) is foolish. Clearly, the War in Iraq has raised many questions. First and foremost should be our intelligence. We cannot allow such disasterous intelligence failures in our government. That is unacceptable. We also should wonder what safegaurds must be implemented to prevent the President from cherry-picking reports for his own benefits. The question we should certainly not ask is 'Was it worth it?" WMDs or not, the War in Iraq was neccesary and worthwhile. Comments | OTHER ISSUES Again... Posted by: Joe on January 31st, 2004 @ 1:29AM Bush Seeks Big Jump in Missile Defense Spending NO. First of all... who is threatening us with missles? I'm not saying that we don't need a defense system, but I don't really think that it is a priority right now, especially when the country is bankrupt. I can understand spending for Iraq and the military, but a superfluous 'pet-program?' Has Bush totally lost his mind? Bush seeks $18 million budget increase for arts YESThis is total and complete bullshit. I'm all for funding the arts with public money, but this is... Oh wait. I don't think the arts should be funded with public money. In fact, it is a wholly unconservative idea to have the government fund a program like this. It is stupid? WHY is Bush doing this? Votes. Plain simple. Bush already has his base in his pocket (provided a Reagan doesn't become magically cured and loses 20 years off his age). Bush can afford to waste money to shape a new image to swing voters. Look! He's funding the arts! He isn't some stupid Texan after all. Total crap. Utter and total crap. :-/ Bush in '04: It isn't like there is a better choice. Comments (1) | GENERAL BLOGGING
ConservativePunk.com Launches Posted by: Joe on January 29th, 2004 @ 11:46PM ConservativePunk.com Hardcore. Comments (1) | GENERAL BLOGGING
Uhhh... Posted by: Joe on January 28th, 2004 @ 12:31AM
What? Comments (1) | HATE MAIL
CYBER ALERT!!!1 Posted by: Joe on January 26th, 2004 @ 8:27PM New Worm Spreading Rapidly Across Internet -Experts
File this one under "No shit." Comments | GENERAL BLOGGING No WMDs in Iraq Posted by: Joe on January 26th, 2004 @ 12:10AM In an interview, Dr. David Kay said the majority of evidence pointed to a strong network of capitbilties, but no actual weapons, admitting most were probably destroyed before the war. I like Scrappleface's opinion on this: Report: WMD Gone Before War, Rumsfeld Says 'My Bad'
Theres more of that in the link. UPDATE The Daily Telegraph of London is reporting Kay says Syria recieved Iraq's WMDs
Perhaps our intelligence wasn't as bad as it looked. Comments (4) | GENERAL BLOGGING
Andrew Sullivan in Time Posted by: Joe on January 25th, 2004 @ 9:16PM Bush's Nanny State I'm getting more and more displeased with Bush with each day. Andrew Sullivan is my favorite blogger (at his site AndrewSullivan.com) and he sums up my feelings on Bush perfectly. Bush is no longer conservative. He has become a moderate with all the wrong ratios. He borrows the nanny state and outrageous spending from the Democrats but keeps the social restrictions of Republicans. That isn't cool. Unfortunately, Conservatives don't really have a choice in the coming election. Bush or someone worse. I wish there was a strong Conservative, Republican canidate to challange Bush and take the Republican nomination, but last time that happened, Democrats took the White House (Perot challanged Bush Sr. in 1992 before going the 3rd party route. The split actually cost Bush the election.) Bush in '04: Its not like theres a better choice. Comments (1) | GENERAL BLOGGING PunxForDean.org Posted by: Joe on January 25th, 2004 @ 12:54PM Wow... just wow.
Comments (3) | GENERAL BLOGGING |
"I kill hobos while listening to Anti-Flag!" - Glenn Renyolds Punk Bloggers Liberty Punk Dr. Ball Alliance Members |